On Aug 4, 10:39=A0am, "The God of Odd Statements, Henry Schmidt"
<popesnarky.godof...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Aug 2008 10:39:51 -0500, dracosilv did most oddly state:
>
> > an old friend wrote:
> >> On Aug 2, 1:02 pm, An Old Fiend <kb9rqz.proudgay...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>> On Jul 29, 6:14 pm, RF King <kb9...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >> fake on altered spam
>
> > And yet he doesn't care. =A0As do we. =A0So quit your 'fake' crusade,
c=
ause it
> > only makes you look the fool.
>
> Well, to be precise, the guy who is/guys who are frogging/occasionally
> forging Mark Morgan/an old friend/KB9RQZ care very much -- they're
> obsessed stalker-kooks trying to pressure Mark off ham radio, off
usenet,
> and off the internet, because he's bi (married to a woman, whom they
> believe to be a she-male, simply because they figure that's what being
> "bi" means...they're not very bright), dyslexic, and doesn't know Morse
> code. That last is what enrages his fellow hams, because they do know
> Morse. As time goes on, I find myself somewhat more sympathetic to Mark
> (despite the cluelessness of trying to shut up his detractors, since he
> can no more shut them up than they can get rid of him), simply because
> their raging impotency is so hilarious. All they can do is lame him for
> what they consider to be inadequacies, but in so doing, they display
thei=
r
> own inherent inadequacy.
>
> Supreme High Overlord of rec.radio.*
I am making no real effor tto to shut them up it can't realy be done
the effort at which I am clearly sucecessfull to to insure they
contiue there same reposnses over and over in a manner that is proven
in effective
a non responsive response like "fake" or get kelp " does keep them
right here and keep them for looking else where to attack
although the non responive response does shut up the fiant hearted
amoug them
|
