Re: Worldwide Feedback Pouring in... VoiceMax a Huge Success!

"james" <george@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:1nvrd3d96641tuseae3rd1a3mslfqckf1v@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 15:42:26 -0700, Telstar Electronics
> <briangriffey@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> |On Sep 4, 3:22 pm, james <geo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> |> Actually an AM signal with a constant 100% modulated signal is more
> |> equivalent to a single tone at a constant level. Just carrier would
be
> |> a condition when there is no modulation.
> |> In either case there is no intelligence being transmitted.
> |
> |Nonsense. Why can't you have multiple frequencies (such as voice) at
> |the 100% level? The answer: you can!
> |Now that signal has all the original intelligence of the voice that
> |created it...
> |www.telstar-electronics.com
> |
> |--------------
>
> One frequency or five thousand frequencies, if they are all at the
> same amplitude the resultant modulated signal is still unintelligable.
>
> You simple can't transmit intelligence with a constant 100% modulated
> AM carrier.
>
> Now if you compressor was advertised at giving a average of 50%
> modulation, then I would not have as much issues. On average an AM
> signal will be about 33% average modulation with peaks at about 100%.
> The human voice generally lies between 3 to 1 and 5 to 1 peak to
> average power.
>
> james

So, if I inject a 1KC continuous tone into an AM transmitter, it will be 
unintelligible?