Talk About Network

Google





Radio > Ham-radio Morse > James Kim: new ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 19 Topic 206 of 262
Post > Topic >>

James Kim: new vs old tech

by notbob <notbob@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Dec 7, 2006 at 03:33 PM

No doubt many are saddened by the senseless loss of James Kim, the
family man that perished in the mountains of Western Oregon early this
week.  I think what makes it all the more tragic is that here was a
person who was on the cutting edge of all the latest and greatest high
tech computer and communications technology.  Blackberries, photo
cellphones, wifi PDA's and laptops, etc.  I'm stunned a person in such
a high tech vector could become so completely isolated in such a short
distance from the mainstream.  

This worries me because it highlights the shortcomings of all this new
high tech gimcrackery.  As I understand it, even satellite cellphones
require a service provider with a nearby uplink antenna.  So, this
brings up my question, as a non ham: 

How long do you think it would have taken James, or anyone in that
situation, to make contact with outside help and get him and his
family out of there if he'd had something like a basic QRP tranceiver
and antenna and knew how to use it?

Any thoughts you may have on this issue would be appreciated.

nb
 




 19 Posts in Topic:
James Kim: new vs old tech
notbob <notbob@[EMAIL   2006-12-07 15:33:59 
Re: James Kim: new vs old tech
"Joel Kolstad"   2006-12-07 13:57:59 
Re: James Kim: new vs old tech
notbob <notbob@[EMAIL   2006-12-07 19:50:53 
Re: James Kim: new vs old tech
Lois <Lois_Lane@[EMAIL  2006-12-08 08:21:17 
Re: James Kim: new vs old tech
BakersT <nomailpls@[EM  2006-12-07 18:25:58 
Re: James Kim: new vs old tech
Scott <acepilot@[EMAIL  2006-12-08 12:31:41 
Re: James Kim: new vs old tech
Lois <Lois_Lane@[EMAIL  2006-12-08 08:26:28 
Re: James Kim: new vs old tech
"Mike Andrews"   2006-12-08 14:07:09 
Re: James Kim: new vs old tech
Scott <acepilot@[EMAIL  2006-12-09 02:22:38 
Re: James Kim: new vs old tech
Dave Oldridge <doldrid  2006-12-09 20:28:45 
Re: James Kim: new vs old tech
Lois <Lois_Lane@[EMAIL  2006-12-08 08:22:58 
Re: James Kim: new vs old tech
No Body <nobody@[EMAIL  2007-01-02 03:42:10 
Re: James Kim: new vs old tech
"Denny" <k8d  2006-12-08 04:57:39 
Re: James Kim: new vs old tech
"Topaz305RK" &l  2006-12-08 06:33:33 
Re: James Kim: new vs old tech
"Zarky Zork" &l  2006-12-09 04:45:50 
Re: James Kim: new vs old tech
Dave Oldridge <doldrid  2006-12-09 20:23:54 
Re: James Kim: new vs old tech
maxfoo <maxfoo@[EMAIL   2006-12-10 11:05:58 
Re: James Kim: new vs old tech
Kurt <ksaves2@[EMAIL P  2006-12-10 19:42:29 
Re: James Kim: new vs old tech
No Body <nobody@[EMAIL  2007-01-02 04:12:48 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Thu Jan 8 13:09:01 PST 2009.